Colonia Dignidad: evidence of the internal contradictions of liberal democracies
The Chilean military coup in 1973 against the elected president Salvador Allende was also supported by a democratic system: the USA. ‘The protecting power of modern democracy betrayed its own values in return,’ emphasises Gorch Pieken. The Children’s Bible thus also relates to current scientific research. The Berlin Cluster of Excellence ‘CONTESTATIONS OF THE LIBERAL SCRIPT (SCRIPTS)’, whose research projects the Humboldt Lab provides insights into, is focussing on such internal contradictions of liberal democracies.
To illustrate the political contexts, a kind of organisation chart will be shown alongside the children’s Bible, providing an insight into the network of dependencies and relationships at Colonia Dignidad.
The children’s Bible was loaned to the HU by former sect member Robert Matthusen. As a child and teenager, he did not have his own copy because the books were kept under lock and key. In the evenings, the person who was responsible for the children would read from the children’s Bible, Matthusen recalls in an interview with the Leipzig production company LOOKSfilm, which is working on a documentary series about Colonia Dignidad.
He particularly liked the stories of Noah and Moses. He later read ‘The Shield of Faith’ to his own children.
In Schäfer’s day, no one talked about the fact that some of the pictures and text passages had been pasted over. It was only when Matthusen later got his hands on an uncensored Bible that he understood what was going on. Everything to do with family or sexuality had been censored – passages such as: ‘And God said to Eve: I will give you pain and sorrow when you become a mother.’
Paul Schäfer claimed that children came directly from the arms of God, Matthusen reports. Men and women had to live separately, love relationships and family life were not allowed. If a woman in the colony was pregnant, she had to hide. ‘That’s why none of us had any idea how a child would be born.’ Schäfer used his version of Christianity to make people compliant. He misused the Bible to ‘bind the conscience’, says Matthusen. He censored the Holy Scriptures that the sect leader referred to himself. ‘Anything that ran counter to his own interests was simply pasted over and crossed out,’ says Birgit Rasch from LOOKSfilm.